Long-term comparison between blind and ultrasound-guided corticoid injections in Morton neuroma.

OBJECTIVES: This work compares the effectiveness of blind versus ultrasound (US)-guided injections for Morton neuroma (MN) up to 3 years of follow-up. METHODS: This is an evaluator-blinded randomised trial in which 33 patients with MN were injected by an experienced orthopaedic surgeon based on anatomical landmarks (blind injection, group 1) and 38 patients were injected by an experienced musculoskeletal radiologist under US guidance (group 2). Patients were assessed using the visual analogue scale and the Manchester Foot Pain and Disability index (MFPDI). Injections consisted of 1 ml of 2% mepivacaine and 40 mg triamcinolone acetonide in each web space with MN. Up to 4 injections were allowed during the first 3 months of follow-up. Follow-up was performed by phone calls and/or scheduled consultations at 15 days, 1 month, 45 days, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2 and 3 years. Statistical analysis was performed using unpaired Student's t tests. RESULTS: No differences in age or clinical measures were found at presentation between group 1 (VAS, 8.5 ± 0.2; MFPDI, 40.9 ± 1.1) and group 2 (VAS, 8.4 ± 0.2; MFPDI, 39.8 ± 1.2). Improvement in VAS was superior in group 2 up to 3 years of follow-up (p < 0.05). Improvement in MFPDI was superior in group 2 from 45 days to 2 years of follow-up (p < 0.05). Satisfaction with the treatment was higher in group 2 (87%) versus group 1 (59.1%) at 3 years of follow-up. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided injections lead to a greater percentage of long-term improvement than blind injections in MN. KEY POINTS: • Ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injections in Morton neuroma provide long-term pain relief in more than 75% of patients. • Ultrasound-guided injections in Morton neuroma led to greater long-term pain relief and less disability than blind injections up to 3 years of follow-up. • The presence of an ipsilateral neuroma is associated with worse long-term disability score.

Infiltrative Therapy of Morton's Neuroma.

The aim of this study is to systematically review the literature on clinical outcomes of patients who have undergone infiltrative therapy for treatment of Morton's neuroma. As many kinds of substances are injected, the main outcome defines which treatment provides the best results in term of patient's satisfaction and pain relief, so that it would be possible to choose the best option. Many electronic databases were searched on July 2021; we have included prospective and retrospective case series, and randomized controlled trials of infiltrative treatments in patients with primary diagnosis of Morton's neuroma. The search returned 25 studies which met the inclusion criteria, with a total of 2243 cases. The incidence of outcomes was extracted and analyzed. Although many studies demonstrated favorable results in terms of pain relief and patient's satisfaction employing different substances for infiltration, alcohol injection appears results on long run.

Efficacy of a Single Corticosteroid Injection for Morton's Neuroma in Adults: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Morton's neuroma is a common condition that routinely presents in podiatric practice. The aim of this study was to systematically synthesize the evidence relating to the effectiveness of a corticosteroid injection for Morton's neuroma. METHODS: Studies with a publication date of 1960 or later were eligible, and searches were performed within the Turning Research Into Practice database; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials; the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Specialised Register; MEDLINE (Ovid); PubMed; Embase; Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature; and the gray literature. Study selection criteria included randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials where a single corticosteroid injection for Morton's neuroma pain was investigated. The primary outcome was Morton's neuroma pain as measured by any standard validated pain scale. RESULTS: Ten studies involving 695 participants were included. The quality of the studies was considered low and subject to bias. Of the included studies, five compared corticosteroid injection to usual care, one compared corticosteroid injection to local anesthetic alone, one compared ultrasound-guided to non-ultrasound-guided injections, three compared corticosteroid injections to surgery, one compared small to large neuromas, six assessed patient satisfaction, four measured adverse events, one studied return to work, and one examined failure of the corticosteroid injection to improve pain. Overall, these studies identified a moderate short- to medium-term benefit of corticosteroid injections on the primary outcome of pain and a low adverse event rate. CONCLUSIONS: A single corticosteroid injection appears to have a beneficial short- to medium-term effect on Morton's neuroma pain. It appears superior to usual care, but its superiority to local anaesthetic alone is questionable, and it is inferior to surgical excision. A very low adverse event rate was noted throughout the studies, indicating the intervention is safe when used for Morton's neuroma. However, the quality of the evidence is low, and these findings may change with further research.

Corticosteroid Injection for Morton's Interdigital Neuroma: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUD: This review aimed to evaluate the effects of corticosteroid injections on Morton's neuroma using an algorithmic approach to assess the methodological quality of reported studies using a structured critical framework. METHODS: Several electronic databases were searched for articles published until April 2020 that evaluated the outcomes of corticosteroid injections in patients diagnosed with Morton's neuroma. Data search, extraction, analysis, and quality assessments were performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). guidelines, and clinical outcomes were evaluated using various outcome measures. RESULTS: With 3-12 months of follow-up, corticosteroid injections provided satisfactory outcomes according to Johnson satisfaction scores except in two studies. Visual analog scale scores showed maximal pain reduction between 1 week and 3 months after injection. We found that 140 subjects out of 469 (29.85%) eventually underwent surgery after receiving corticosteroid injections due to persistent pain. CONCLUSIONS: Corticosteroid injections showed a satisfactory clinical outcome in patients with Morton's interdigital neuroma although almost 30% of the included subjects eventually underwent operative treatment. Our recommendation for future research includes using more objective outcome parameters, such as foot and ankle outcome scores or foot and ankle ability measures. Moreover, studies on the safety and effectiveness of multiple injections at the same site are highly necessary.

Treating Morton's neuroma by injection, neurolysis, or neurectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of pain and satisfaction outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Individual evidence suggests that multiple modalities can be used to treat entrapment pathology by Morton's neuroma, including injection, neurolysis, and neurectomy. However, their impacts on patient pain and satisfaction have yet to be fully defined or elucidated. Correspondingly, our aim was to pool systematically identified metadata and substantiate the impact of these different modalities in treating Morton's neuroma with respect to these outcomes. METHODS: Searches of 7 electronic databases from inception to October 2019 were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Articles were screened against pre-specified criteria. The incidences of outcomes were extracted and pooled by random-effects meta-analysis of proportions. RESULTS: A total of 35 articles satisfied all criteria, reporting a total of 2998 patients with Morton's neuroma managed by one of the three modalities. Incidence of complete pain relief after injection (43%; 95% CI, 23-64%) was significantly lower than neurolysis (68%; 95% CI, 51-84%) and neurectomy (74%; 95% CI, 66-82%) (P = 0.02). Incidence of complete satisfaction after injection (35%; 95% CI, 21-50%) was significantly lower than neurolysis (63%; 95% CI, 50-74%) and neurectomy (57%; 95% CI, 47-67%) (P < 0.01). The need to proceed to further surgery was significantly greater following injection (15%; 95% CI, 9-23%) versus neurolysis (2%; 95% CI, 0-4%) or neurectomy (5%; 95% CI, 3-7%) (P < 0.01). Incidence of procedural complications did not differ between modalities (P = 0.30). CONCLUSIONS: Although all interventions demonstrated favorable procedural complication incidences, surgical interventions by either neurolysis or neurectomy appear to trend towards greater incidences of complete pain relief and complete patient satisfaction outcomes compared to injection treatment. The optimal decision-making algorithm for treatment for Morton's neuroma should incorporate these findings to better form and meet the expectations of patients.

Effectiveness of corticosteroid injections in Civinini-Morton's Syndrome: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this paper is to analyze the effectiveness of corticosteroid injections (CI), in combination with or without a local anaesthetic, for Civinini-Morton's Syndrome to determine which protocol could be the most appropriate among conservative treatments. METHODS: All selected articles were screened using a thorough database search of PubMed, EMBASE and SCOPUS to assess their suitability to the research focus. RESULTS: Selection produced 10 articles as full-text, for a total of 590 patients, with a mean follow-up of 14 ± 14.2 (range 3-48) months. Johnson satisfaction scale, resulting from 6 studies, scored 25.6% (range 5-38) and 39.4% (range 15-51.8), respectively completely satisfied and satisfied with minor reservations. Mean VAS, declared in 5 studies, decreased from 70.7 ± 16.5 (range 67-89) to 33.4 ± 7.6 (26-42.5) points (p < 0.01). Most common complication was skin depigmentation in 7 (2.6%) cases. CONCLUSIONS: CI appear to be a safe treatment allowing good results with a very low complications rate. A neuroma of 6.3 mm seems to be the cut-off size; below which CI could have best indications and be considered as an intermediate treatment between shoe modifications and more invasive procedures such as percutaneous alcoholization or surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, systematic review.

Improved Injection Technique of Ethanol for Morton's Neuroma.

BACKGROUND: Morton's neuroma is a common cause of forefoot pain. Various conservative methods (injections of various pharmacologic agents) have been published with an outcome of 6%-75% success rate (free of pain in daily life) per injection. The aim of the present study was to assess the outcome of an improved localization technique, a higher dosage, and a higher percentage of ethanol. METHODS: Using fluoroscopic and electroneurographic guidance, 2.5 mL of 70% ethanol were injected into 33 feet with a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-verified neuroma. We evaluated patients at up to 5-year follow-up. RESULTS: A "success rate" of more than 82% per single injection (defined as free of pain in daily life) was achieved and no recurrence was seen over 5 years. All scores (visual analog scale; Short Form-36 subscales, American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot score) showed significant improvement (P < .0001). Mean 1.2 injections were necessary. No significant side effects were seen. However, some mild pain persisted in some patients who participated in sports. CONCLUSION: The injection of 2.5 mL of 70% ethanol under fluoroscopic and electroneurographic guidance was a safe method for the treatment of MRI-verified Morton's neuromas. Combining the effect of a higher percentage of alcohol and a higher dosage and an improved localization technique resulted in a high rate of patients without pain. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, cases series, prospective.

Prediction of Clinical Prognosis according to Intermetatarsal Distance and Neuroma Size on Ultrasonography in Morton Neuroma: A Prospective Observational Study.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate the clinical importance of intermetatarsal distance, size of neuroma, and proportion of neuroma in the intermetatarsal space in examinations of Morton neuroma using ultrasonography. METHODS: Clinical prognosis was observed prospectively after corticosteroid injections in 136 patients with Morton neuroma, and the results were compared with ultrasonographic parameters of intermetatarsal distance, size of neuroma, and proportion of neuroma in the intermetatarsal space. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients (15%) did not respond to corticosteroid injections and underwent surgical treatment for Morton neuroma. Logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the size of the neuroma was the sole predictor of failure of corticosteroid injections (P = .002). No other factors were significant for the prediction of clinical prognosis (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: The size of the neuroma on ultrasonography is the sole predictor of corticosteroid injection failure, while intermetatarsal distance and proportion of neuroma in the intermetatarsal space are not significant when predicting clinical prognosis of Morton neuroma.

Short term comparison between blind and ultrasound guided injection in morton neuroma.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this work is to compare the effectiveness of blind and ultrasound-guided injection for Morton's neuroma (MN) to determine which is more appropriate as the initial procedure in conservative treatment. METHODS: This is an evaluator-blinded randomised trial. Of the 56 included patients, 27 were assigned to the blind group (A) and 29 to the ultrasound-guided group (B). Injection includes 1 ml of 2% mepivacaine and 40 mg of triamcinolone in each web space with MN. The included patients were assessed clinically by VAS score and the Manchester Foot Pain and Disability Score (MFPDS). The follow-up was performed at 15 days, 1 month, 45 days, 2 months, 3 months and 6 months after the initial injection. RESULTS: No differences in age or clinical measurements were found at presentation between group A and group B. At the follow-up, the ultrasound-guided group showed greater symptomatic relief at several stages of the follow-up: 45 days (VAS 3.0 ± 0.5 versus 5.5 ± 0.5, p = 0.001; MFPDS: 32.2 ± 1.8 versus 38.8 ± 2.0, p = 0.018), 2 months (VAS: 3.1 ± 0.5 versus 5.6 ± 0.5, p = 0.002; MFPDS: 31.5 ± 1.9 versus 38.5 ± 2.1, p = 0.020) and 3 months (VAS: 3.1 ± 0.4 versus 5.2 ± 0.6, p = 0.010; MFPDS: 31.2 ± 1.9 versus 37.7 ± 2.4, p = 0.047). CONCLUSION: Injection of MN under ultrasound guidance provides a statistically significant improvement at some stages of the follow-up (45 days, 2 and 3 months), compared with blind injection. KEY POINTS: • Ultrasound-guided steroid injections in Morton's neuroma provide short-term pain relief to over 60% of the patients. • Ultrasound-guided injections in Morton's neuroma lead to a higher percentage of short-term pain relief than blind injections. • Ultrasound-guided injections in Morton's neuroma lead to a lower percentage of skin side effects than blind injections.

Risk factors and the associated cutoff values for failure of corticosteroid injection in treatment of Morton's neuroma.

BACKGROUND: Understanding the risk factors that predict the prognosis of Morton's neuroma after corticosteroid injection would help clinicians determine the appropriate treatment protocol. However, the cut-off values for the risk factors are unknown. The aim of this study was to identify the risk factors and cut-off values that predict failure of corticosteroid injection in treatment of Morton's neuroma. METHOD: Among 201 patients who had corticosteroid injection for Morton's neuroma, 40 underwent further treatment after injections. Injection was performed with ultrasound guidance following ultrasound confirmation of the diagnosis. We compared demographic information, size of the neuroma, and other comorbidities between the patients who did and did not undergo further treatment after injection in order to determine the risk factors of failure. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to determine optimal cutoff values for each risk factor. RESULTS: Stepwise logistic regression analysis showed that larger neuromas (p < 0.001) and younger patients (p = 0.026) predicted the failure of corticosteroid injection. The optimal cutoff value for the size of the neuroma was 6.3 mm (sensitivity, 81%; specificity, 95%; positive predictive value, 84%; negative predictive value, 88%) for predicting the failure of corticosteroid injection. Age was not associated with a specific cutoff value. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that, with a cut-off value of 6.3 mm, larger Morton's neuromas were associated with failure of corticosteroid injection.

Skin depigmentation along lymph vessels of the lower leg following local corticosteroid injection for interdigital neuroma.

Steroid injection is frequently used in the treatment of interdigital neuroma and has a high rate of success. We report the case of a patient who develops skin depigmentation at the injection site and linear streaks of depigmentation over the foot, the ankle and half way up to the knee after a steroid injection for interdigital neuroma. Minor disadvantages such as subcutaneous fat atrophy and depigmentation of the skin at the injection site are well known problems following steroid injection. Depigmentation of the skin with a lymphatic distribution in the foot after steroid injection for interdigital neuroma however, has not yet been reported before. This complication is a serious aesthetic problem and clinicians should be aware of this complication when treating patients with steroid injections for interdigital neuroma.

Percutaneous alcohol injection under sonographic guidance in Morton's neuroma: follow-up in 220 treated lesions.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of percutaneous treatment of Civinini-Morton's syndrome due to solitary Morton's neuroma and analyze the effect of clinico-demographic factors on outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Alcohol injection was performed under sonographic guidance in 220 consecutive patients. Pain intensity using a numerical rating scale (NRS), pain features, limitation of everyday activities and comorbidity with other forefoot conditions were evaluated at presentation. Patients were reassessed for symptoms and the need of rescue therapy with neurectomy after a mean follow-up of 19.0 months (range 15-24). RESULTS: We treated 220 patients (33 males, mean age 55.8 years). Neuromas were located in the III intermetatarsal space in 85.5 %, with a mean size of 5.4 mm. When considering a reduction of pain intensity of ≥50 % of NRS or a complete disappearance of the neuropathic features as a satisfactory clinical response, a 72.3 % (p < 0.001) responder rate was obtained, and only three patients relapsed (1.2 %). An improvement in limitation of everyday activities was observed in 88.6 % (p < 0.001). No influence of clinico-demographic variables on outcome was found. No major complications occurred. Patients with unsatisfactory response had an overload-related comorbid condition in 20/61 (32.8 %). Surgery was later performed in 14 non-responder patients. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-guided alcoholization demonstrated a safe profile, relieved neuropathic symptoms in a majority of patients and improved their quality of life. Rescue therapy with surgery is feasible in patients with unsatisfactory response. However, a thorough evaluation for forefoot comorbidities should be obtained, as they may act as confounding factors.